When we published results of our first analysis on optimal length of laying cycles, under conditions of
the German egg market 25 years ago, considering only a single cycle, it was concluded that about
1 DM per hen place per year more could be earned if a strain with persistent production were kept
for an extended laying period. Since then, the persistency of egg production has been further increased,
and we extended the question to include molting as a possibility. Our calculations are based on a
defined set of assumptions.
When results from the North Carolina Management Test were converted from life time egg income
over feed cost (table 1) to annual figures (table 2), a significant advantage of a long single cycle to
85 (instead of 72) weeks was apparent for white-egg layers, but not for brown-egg layers. Molting
did not improve annual IOFC per hen place.
The question of optimum placement schedules with one or two cycles was further analyzed, including
pullet costs, based on U.S. egg and feed prices and performance standards for LSL Lite hens in North
America. The final results are shown in figure 5 and table 4: a single cycle to about 85 weeks of age
can increase annual egg income over pullet and feed cost by about 1 U.S $, compared to about 105
weeks of age after molting.
Results for other strains (especially less persistent or brown-egg strains) may differ. Molting can be
economical if pullet prices are high and/or premium prices are paid for large eggs. The Global
Competence Team of Lohmann Tierzucht will be happy to answer questions.
However, particularly when using alternative ingredients and reducing the dependency on antibiotics,
intestinal health must become a key focus. Optimizing protein digestibility can help to minimize the
intestinal problems. In addition, mycotoxin contamination must be dealt with and novel feed additives
and feed ingredients considered. The entire system must be thoroughly reviewed and existing margins
for improvement exploited in all areas of production.
Within given constraints, management decisions focus on overall profitability of the business. The
profit from egg production for a farm or a specific flock of laying hens depends on many variables,
including (1) market preferences for different egg size and management conditions, (2) availability of
suitable rearing conditions, (3) disease control and nutrition throughout the life cycle, (4) pullet and
spent hen prices, (5) seasonal variation in egg prices and (6) genetic potential of a given strain of
laying hens. Historically, most flocks were housed annually, and egg production followed seasonal
cycles. In Europe, most chicks used to hatch early in the year, and the custom of eating eggs “ad
libitum” at Easter helped to utilize surplus production at peak rate of lay, while eggs were short in
supply late in the year, when most hens went into a natural molt and winter pause.
Since the introduction of lighting programs, chicks can hatch throughout the year, and eggs can be
produced to meet any demand. Today’s commercial layers have the genetic potential to maintain high
egg production and acceptable shell quality for more than 12 months, and producers can vary their
placement schedules to maximize egg income over cost, depending on seasonal price cycles,
preferences of retail chains and specific customer demand in niche markets.
The optimum length of a laying period has been the subject of many studies for more than 50 years
and mathematical tools were developed to determine the optimum under defined assumptions (White,
1959; Yassin et al., 2012). Kühne and Flock (1978) compared weekly egg production records of an early
maturing vs. a later maturing strain to demonstrate substantial differences in lifetime profitability if the
choice of strain is combined with the strain-specific optimum length of laying period. The theoretically
“optimal” replacement schedule calls for keeping the current flock in production as long as its weekly
contribution margin exceeds the expected average weekly contribution margin of a new flock. However,
these model calculations ignore seasonal variation in monthly egg income, which may be important
if these effects are predictable.
Since the study of Kühne and Flock (1978), the persistency of egg production and shell strength has
been significantly improved in modern strains of laying hens and more computerized data are available on daily feed intake in environment controlled egg production units. Bell (2012) recently analyzed
and commented the performance of LSL Lite flocks under US conditions, focusing on the variance
between flocks during the first laying cycle up to 60 weeks of age, when many egg producers in the
U.S. traditionally molt their flocks. In the current analysis we will focus on factors determining the
optimum length of the laying period and answer the question whether it pays off to molt LSL Lite
layers. We answer this question by annualising the contribution margin of flocks housed for one and
The final report of the 38th North Carolina layer performance and management test (Anderson, 2012)
includes valuable information on the question of molting under U.S. conditions. This 83-page report
contains 64 tables and 19 graphs with detailed results from 11 white-egg and 7 brown-egg strains,
housed at different densities and exposed to different management alternatives. Table 1 shows the
average egg income minus feed cost for all white-egg and all brown-egg entries across two cage
densities; results for a control line are also shown as a measure of genetic progress.
Table 1: Egg income over feed cost (IOFC) per hen housed depending on the length of the
laying period and after non-anorexic molting
The results in this table suggest what is widely accepted in the U.S. egg industry: the egg income
over feed cost is higher if the hens are either kept beyond 12 months of lay in a single cycle (68
instead of 52 weeks), or kept for a second cycle after a non-anorexic molt at 69 weeks of age (instead
of keeping the hens to 109 weeks of age without molting).
But this is only half of the story and tells us little about be optimum placement schedule unless we
convert the IOFC figures from table 1 to annual production. These results are shown in Table 2 and
will probably surprise egg producers who are convinced that recycling is good business for them.
Table 2: Annual egg income over feed cost (IOFC) per hen housed depending on the length
of the laying period and after non-anorexic molting
If a single cycle to 85 weeks (595 days) of age were close to the optimum, we should not expect good
business people to prefer recycling. Have we overlooked something? In order to get a more realistic
estimate of maximum annual IOFC we have to take weekly egg income and feed cost into account.
In the following calculations, we will use the standard for LSL Lite in North America. The input
parameters and conclusions may differ for other strains.
Egg income is calculated from the weekly rate of lay, percentage of second grade eggs, average egg
weight and the corresponding percentage of eggs in the different size categories according to the
breed standard for LSL-Lite in North America (LTZ, 2012) and egg prices according to Table 3; spent
hens are assumed to have no market value.
Table 3: Egg grades, size categories and US prices
Weekly feed costs are calculated from the breed standard for daily feed consumption and a fixed
price of 350 $ per ton, similar to the average feed price during the first cycle in the North Carolina
Which length of laying period would these calculations suggest as optimum to maximize annual IOFC?
Chart 1 suggests a maximum of approx. 15 $ per hen place and year if the flock is terminated at
about 71 weeks of age. However, this is not yet the optimum replacement schedule.
Chart 1: Annual egg production and annual IOFC per bird place and year depending on
culling age of the flock
To get closer to the optimum replacement schedule, we have to take pullet cost into account. Other
variable costs like labor, energy, water or veterinary costs will reduce the contribution margin, but are
negligible in terms of the optimum length of laying period. We assume four weeks down-time between
flocks, without considering extra cleaning costs.
Chart 2: Effect of pullet price on optimum culling age and annual egg income minus feed
and pullets costs per bird place and year
Chart 2 shows the general effect of pullet price on optimal replacement schedule, with pullet prices
exceeding the range found in practice. Obviously, high pullet prices (or shortage of pullet rearing
facilities) will be a strong argument for a longer laying period. Assuming a pullet price of 5 $, annual
egg income over feed and pullet cost would be optimized at a culling age of 86 weeks.
So far we only considered housing for a single cycle up to 90 weeks of age. Chart 4 shows the results
of IOFC optimization allowing a second cycle up to a total age of 115 weeks based on the performance standard shown Chart 3.
Chart 3: Standard performance of LSL-Lite during two cycles up to 115 weeks
Chart 4: Eggs per year and annual IOFC depending on the culling age of the flock
Chart 4 only shows that it would not make sense to molt if pullet cost could be ignored. Chart 5 shows
what happens if a pullet price of 5 $ is included in the calculations. The egg income minus feed and
pullet costs reaches a second peak after the molt, with a rather flat top of the curve around 105 weeks
of age. However, this second peak is one dollar lower than the optimum for a single cycle to 86 weeks
Chart 5: Annual egg income minus pullet and feed cost per hen place
for single cycle to 90 weeks vs. two cycles to 115 weeks of age
The results of our model calculations show that LSL-Lite hens may reach an optimum in a single
cycle around 85-90 weeks of age or a somewhat lower annual egg income over feed and pullet costs
around 100-105 weeks of age.
Despite the economic advantage of single cycle production demonstrated in Chart 5, recycling flocks
may be preferred as a means to increase average egg weight. The expected differences in grading
results are shown in Table 4. A predictable demand for extra large eggs at a premium price may justify
Table 4: Calculated percentage of eggs in different size categories depending on culling
ANDERSON, K. (2012): Final Report of the 38th North Carolina Layer Performance and Management Test. NC State
University, Cooperative Extension Service.
BELL, D. (2012): U.S. Experiences with Lohmann Selected Leghorn (LSL-Lite) Layers. Part 4: Economic Evaluation of
Flock Performance. Lohmann Information 47(2): 34-40.
KÜHNE, W., FLOCK, D.K. (1978). Bestimmung der optimalen Haltungsdauer von Legehennen in Abhängigkeit vom Verlauf
der Produktionskurve und anderen Einflüssen. Lohmann Information Mai/Juni 1978: 1-10.
LTZ (2012): Management Guide Layers. Lohmann LSL-Lite North American Edition.
WHITE, W.C. (1959). The Determination of an Optimal Replacement Policy for a Continually Operating Egg Production
Enterprise. Am. J. Agr. Econ. (1959) 41(5): 1535-1542.
YASSIN, H., VELTHUIS, A. G. J., GIESEN, G. W. J., OUDE LANSINK, A. G. J. M. (2012). A model for an economically
optimal replacement of a breeder flock. Poultry Science 91:3271-3279.
Optimale Haltungsdauer von Legehennen – lohnt sich eine Mauser?
Die Entscheidung über die Haltungsdauer von Legehennen kann in hohem Maße die Profitabilität
der Legehennenhaltung beeinflussen. Ergebnisse aus dem 38. “North Carolina Layer Performance and
Management Test” zeigen klare Vorteile einer Mauser gegenüber gleich langer Haltung bis zum Alter
von 109 Wochen, wenn man nur den kumulativen Eiererlös minus Futterkosten zugrunde legt (Tab.
1). Wenn man jedoch die Jahresleistung betrachtet, verschiebt sich das Optimum und erreicht ein
Maximum bei 85 Wochen Schlachtalter (Tab. 2).
Wir haben in unseren Berechnungen für die Herkunft LSL Lite die Standards für Nordamerika zugrunde
gelegt und auch die Junghennenkosten berücksichtigt. Demnach kann eine Einphasenhaltung bis
etwa 85 Wochen pro Hennenplatz und Jahr etwa 1 U.S. $ mehr Gewinn bringen als Zweiphasenhaltung
bis etwa 100-105 Wochen (Abb. 5). Diese Ergebnisse sind nicht auf andere Herkünfte zu übertragen.
Hohe Kosten für Junghennen und/oder besonders attraktive Preisen für XL Eier sind Argumente für
Mauser; Argumente des Tierwohls sprechen gegen Mauser.
Wer die wichtigsten Leistungsdaten für seine Herden wöchentlich erfasst, kann aus eigenen Daten in
Modellrechnungen das betriebsspezifische Optimum ableiten. Erfahrene Mitarbeiter des Global
Competence Teams der Lohmann Tierzucht bieten hierzu gerne Hilfestellung an.